Scientific foundations & validation

How we build calibrated synthetic populations (digital twins) and how we validate their predictive power.

Our approach

Pollitics models synthetic populations (“digital twins”) that respect socio-demographic and country-aware constraints. Respondents are generated then calibrated to reflect the true structure of the target population.

  • Multi-dimensional constraints: age, sex, education, income, marital status, region, residence, etc.
  • Coherence rules (country, regions, conditional distributions)
  • Periodic re-calibrations and drift monitoring
  • Reproducible, auditable runs
Validation

We validate along two axes: (1) fit to official distributions and (2) agreement with published human polls. The figures below illustrate both.

  • Fit: “Target vs. Observed” comparisons per attribute
  • Opinion: public questions benchmarked against reputable surveys
  • Robustness: score & segment stability over time

Demographic fit — examples

Charts compare target distributions (official baselines) with observed ones (calibrated synthetic cohorts).

Target vs Observed — Japan
Japan — observed distributions closely match targets across attributes (age, education, gender, etc.).

Opinion — benchmarks vs human polls

Comparisons on public questions. Residual gaps inform our re-calibration schedule.

Abortion — Ipsos vs Pollitics
Abortion — % Yes (Humans vs Pollitics): overall coherence supports the external validity of our digital twins (Ipsos, Global Views on Abortion (2023)).

Methodology at a glance

1. Generation & constraints

We generate a candidate population and enforce margin constraints (raking) and coherence (e.g., conditional distributions by region).

2. Iterative calibration

An adjustment loop aligns observed frequencies to official targets, penalizing multi-dimensional deviations.

3. External validation

We compare opinion scores to published human polls on reputable panels; we measure gaps and correct them.

4. Re-calibration & drift

We track drift and schedule periodic re-calibrations to reflect context and news dynamics.

Ethics, transparency & limits

Need technical detail or an audit? Get in touch. Talk with the R&D team